Peer Review Process
All manuscripts submitted to Sahata: Jurnal Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat undergo a rigorous peer-review process to ensure the quality and integrity of the published articles.
The review process is conducted as follows:
- Initial Screening
The editorial team evaluates the submitted manuscript to ensure it fits the journal’s focus and scope, follows the author guidelines, and is free from plagiarism. - Double-Blind Peer Review
Manuscripts that pass the initial screening are reviewed by at least two independent reviewers using a double-blind review system, where both authors and reviewers remain anonymous. - Review Decision
Based on the reviewers’ comments, the editor will make one of the following decisions: accept, minor revision, major revision, or reject. - Revision Process
Authors are required to revise their manuscripts according to the reviewers’ suggestions within the specified time. - Final Decision
The editor makes the final decision based on the revised manuscript and reviewers’ recommendations. - Publication
Accepted manuscripts are published in the journal according to the publication schedule.
The review process ensures objectivity, fairness, and academic quality in every published article.
